In Chapter 7 we learn about the differences in Africa and America. Americas lacked nearly all animals suitable for domestication, Africa imported previously domesticated sheep, goats, chickens, and horses, metallurgy was less developed in the Americas, and they had smaller civilizations. We also learn of the Meroe, who were the oldest in the Egyptian empire, they flourished between 300 bce-100 ce. The Meroe people were ruled by a monarch who was usually a female. They specialized in mostly iron-working, they were skilled at hearding and farming, and instead of irrigation they used rainfall for crops.
Which statement of Tacitus might you regard as reliable, and which are more suspect? Why? I do not think that we can take any statements from Tacitus as reliable except for statements that are purely factual. This is because it states that Tacitus never visited the lands of the people he described. He only relied on others works of writing and story telling. We cannot regard him as reliable becuase we do not even know if there is any credibility in his statements.
Comments
Post a Comment